<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labour to axe swimming in Clapham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lambethconservatives.com/2009/03/labour-axe-clapham-pool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lambethconservatives.com/2009/03/labour-axe-clapham-pool/</link>
	<description>Working in West Norwood, West Dulwich, Streatham, Clapham, Brixton, Herne Hill, Stockwell, Kennington, Vauxhall &#38; Waterloo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:54:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norwoodsman</title>
		<link>http://www.lambethconservatives.com/2009/03/labour-axe-clapham-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Norwoodsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambethconservatives.com/?p=442#comment-75</guid>
		<description>This is a real shame. I haven&#039;t used these baths much, but I know they are valued. I joined a private gym (with pool), as there is talk of a swimming pool in Norwood but it will take years under this council, if the experience of the &quot;Hub&quot; project in Streatham is anything to go by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a real shame. I haven&#8217;t used these baths much, but I know they are valued. I joined a private gym (with pool), as there is talk of a swimming pool in Norwood but it will take years under this council, if the experience of the &#8220;Hub&#8221; project in Streatham is anything to go by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.lambethconservatives.com/2009/03/labour-axe-clapham-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Swimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambethconservatives.com/?p=442#comment-74</guid>
		<description>This policy annoys me: swimming is a habbit, and amongst the young it is easily lost if not exercised. 

The two posters above are somewhat naive. They still believe that when Lambeth Council promises something, &quot;it will happen&quot;. That has not been my experience.

&quot;Geoff&quot; says &quot;Brixton is just down the road&quot;. 

&quot;Just down the road&quot; is a long way for those without cars.

&quot;Obb&quot; is misinformed. Swimming &quot;is&quot; going to be axed: for at least 17 Months. In all probablility longer. This is no &quot;rumour&quot;. I suggest he calls the Labour councillors for Clapham. They will confirm that what they formerly campaigned against, they are now going to implement.

The council should have built a new pool nearby, as suggested above, &quot;then&quot; redeveloped the existing site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This policy annoys me: swimming is a habbit, and amongst the young it is easily lost if not exercised. </p>
<p>The two posters above are somewhat naive. They still believe that when Lambeth Council promises something, &#8220;it will happen&#8221;. That has not been my experience.</p>
<p>&#8220;Geoff&#8221; says &#8220;Brixton is just down the road&#8221;. </p>
<p>&#8220;Just down the road&#8221; is a long way for those without cars.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obb&#8221; is misinformed. Swimming &#8220;is&#8221; going to be axed: for at least 17 Months. In all probablility longer. This is no &#8220;rumour&#8221;. I suggest he calls the Labour councillors for Clapham. They will confirm that what they formerly campaigned against, they are now going to implement.</p>
<p>The council should have built a new pool nearby, as suggested above, &#8220;then&#8221; redeveloped the existing site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obb</title>
		<link>http://www.lambethconservatives.com/2009/03/labour-axe-clapham-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>obb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambethconservatives.com/?p=442#comment-73</guid>
		<description>What a complete load of twaddle. Swimming ISN&#039;T going to be &#039;axed&#039; (wonderful tabloid speak btw) in Clap&#039;ham - a brand new pool is being built. See the difference?

Spreading rumour for political gain is cheap. It also makes you appear rather foolish, given that by your own admission, a new pool is being built.

http://onionbagblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/clapham-whispers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a complete load of twaddle. Swimming ISN&#8217;T going to be &#8216;axed&#8217; (wonderful tabloid speak btw) in Clap&#8217;ham &#8211; a brand new pool is being built. See the difference?</p>
<p>Spreading rumour for political gain is cheap. It also makes you appear rather foolish, given that by your own admission, a new pool is being built.</p>
<p><a href="http://onionbagblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/clapham-whispers.html" rel="nofollow">http://onionbagblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/clapham-whispers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.lambethconservatives.com/2009/03/labour-axe-clapham-pool/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambethconservatives.com/?p=442#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Brixton&#039;s just down the road - and is excellent.

Clapham needs completely rebuilding.  Don&#039;t be silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brixton&#8217;s just down the road &#8211; and is excellent.</p>
<p>Clapham needs completely rebuilding.  Don&#8217;t be silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
